FlyerIntel Research

Two Airlines on One Route

Compared in the same departure windows, two airlines on a route still differ by about five points, and the difference lasts.

Published September 26, 2026 · Source period July 2023 – July 2026

Summary

On 944 routes where two airlines that sell their own seats each flew enough to compare, the two differed in on-time arrival by a median 4.9 points when compared only in the departure windows they share (5.5 over the whole route), and by 10 points or more in 18.4% of 1,721 pairs. The difference lasts: the airline ahead in the even-numbered months was ahead in the odd-numbered ones in 87.1% of pairs, and in 99.6% of the pairs where the gap was large. United Airlines came out 6.6 points ahead of the airlines it met and Frontier Airlines 4.9 behind. A hub carrier had no edge on the routes leaving its own hub.

Key findings

  • Across 1,721 pairs of airlines on 944 routes, the median gap in on-time arrival is 4.9 points when the two are compared in the departure windows both fly, against 5.5 over the whole route. Holding the time of day fixed removes little of it.
  • 18.4% of pairs differ by 10 points or more, and in 266 pairs (15.5%) the airline ahead over the whole route is behind once the windows are matched.
  • The gaps last. Splitting the months into even-numbered and odd-numbered, the same airline led in both sets in 87.1% of 1,379 pairs, and in 281 of the 282 pairs that led by 10 points or more in the even-numbered months, with an average gap of 12.2 points in the second.
  • Against the airlines they meet on the same route and window, United Airlines is 6.6 points ahead and Frontier Airlines 4.9 behind. The order differs from the whole-network ranking: American Airlines moves from fifth to third and Alaska Airlines moves from third to fifth.
  • On routes leaving the hub of one of the two airlines, the hub carrier was ahead of its rival in 50.2% of 325 pairs, by a median +0.1 points; on routes arriving at its hub, in 60.6% of 315, by +1.5. Home is not an advantage.
  • Envoy Air was ahead of American Airlines on 93.9% of the 115 routes both flew, with a median gap of +8.8 points; PSA Airlines was ahead of American Airlines on 65.1% of the 109 routes both flew, with a median gap of +1.9 points.
  • The widest gap is on DEN to PHL: United Airlines 88.3% on time and Frontier Airlines 57.2% in the same windows, 31.1 points apart.

How two airlines are compared

A pair is two airlines that both sell their own seats and both fly the same origin and destination: American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, Delta Air Lines, Frontier Airlines, Allegiant Air, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines. Regional carriers that fly for a larger airline are not in the pairs, because a passenger does not choose them, and they get their own section below. Each airline’s flights on a route are sorted into the site’s six departure windows. The two airlines are compared only in the windows where both have at least 120 flights, and their on-time rates are averaged over those windows with the same weights, so the same windows count the same amount for each. The route, the time of day and the season are then the same for both. An airline counts as flying a route with at least 200 flights on it, and a pair is used when each airline has at least 500 flights in the windows the two share. The gap is the better airline’s on-time rate minus the other’s. The whole-route gap is the same difference taken over every flight the two flew on the route, which is what a route page shows.

How far apart two airlines are on one route

How far apart two airlines are on one route
Gap in on-time arrivalPairs, same windowsShare of pairs, same windowsPairs, whole routeShare of pairs, whole route
Under 2 points38922.6%32518.9%
2 to 5 points48428.1%47027.3%
5 to 10 points53130.9%52930.7%
10 to 15 points21912.7%25514.8%
15 points or more985.7%1428.3%

1,721 pairs on 944 routes. The gap is taken without its sign, so it says how far apart two airlines are and not which is ahead. The median is 4.9 points matched and 5.5 over the whole route.

Share of pairs by gap in on-time arrival, same windows

Under 2 points · 389 pairs22.6%
2 to 5 points · 484 pairs28.1%
5 to 10 points · 531 pairs30.9%
10 to 15 points · 219 pairs12.7%
15 points or more · 98 pairs5.7%

It is not the time of day

Two airlines on one route often fly at different times, and the evening is worse than the morning, so part of a gap could be timing. Matching the windows changes the median gap from 5.5 to 4.9 points. It does change who is ahead in 266 pairs, 15.5% of them, and those pairs were close to begin with: their median whole-route gap was 2.2 points. Nor is it chance. Splitting the months into even-numbered and odd-numbered, so that both sets run through the whole year, 1,379 pairs had enough flights in both sets to compare. The same airline led in both in 87.1% of them. Of the 282 pairs that led by 10 points or more in the even-numbered months, 281 led again in the odd-numbered ones, and the average gap there was still 12.2 points. Each set needs at least 250 matched flights per airline.

The gap in the even-numbered months against the odd-numbered

The gap in the even-numbered months against the odd-numbered
Gap in the even-numbered monthsPairsSame airline ahead in the odd-numbered monthsAverage gap in the odd-numbered months, from that airline’s side
Under 2 points28860.4%+0.9 points
2 to 5 points38086.6%+3.0 points
5 to 10 points42997.2%+6.1 points
10 to 15 points19199.5%+10.3 points
15 points or more91100.0%+16.3 points

Months are split into even-numbered and odd-numbered. Pairs are grouped by how far apart the two airlines were in the even-numbered months, and the odd-numbered months are read from the point of view of the airline that led in the even-numbered ones, so a positive figure means it kept its lead. A group needs at least 30 pairs.

Airlines ranked against the airlines they meet

For each airline, the table averages its matched gap over every pair it is in, weighted by its own flights in the shared windows. A positive figure means that on the same routes in the same windows it beat the airlines it met by that many points. United Airlines is highest at +6.6 and Frontier Airlines lowest at -4.9. Two things separate this from the whole-network ranking: an airline is compared only where it has company, and only in the windows it shares. American Airlines moves from fifth to third and Alaska Airlines moves from third to fifth. An airline that mostly meets strong rivals is held to a higher standard than one that meets weak ones, so the figure is a comparison with the field an airline actually faces and not a score against all carriers. An airline appears with at least 30 pairs.

Each airline against the airlines it meets on the same route and window

Each airline against the airlines it meets on the same route and window
AirlineOn time, all its flightsRank, all its flightsAgainst the airlines it meetsRank, against themPairsRoutesShare of its flights on those routes
United Airlines79.8%second+6.6 pointsfirst56437666%
Delta Air Lines82.1%first+5.4 pointssecond64542962%
American Airlines74.9%fifth-0.6 pointsthird56437951%
Southwest Airlines78.4%fourth-2.3 pointsfourth69146536%
Alaska Airlines78.8%third-3.4 pointsfifth23916064%
JetBlue72.6%sixth-3.5 pointssixth26116770%
Frontier Airlines72.1%seventh-4.9 pointsseventh47127379%

Ordered by the figure against the airlines it meets. On time is the share of flights that arrived fewer than 15 minutes late. Carriers that did not report every month are not compared.

A hub is not a home advantage

An airline is the hub carrier at an airport when it has the largest share of its departures, at least 40%. On the routes that leave a hub carrier’s own hub, the hub carrier was ahead of the rival in 50.2% of 325 pairs, by a median +0.1 points. On routes that arrive at its hub it was ahead in 60.6% of 315, by a median +1.5. Flying out of its own hub gives an airline no measurable edge over a rival flying the same route at the same time. The airport-level view understates hub carriers. Set against every other airline at the airport, a hub carrier’s on-time rate looks lower than it does against rivals on the same routes in the same windows: at 13 of 17 hubs the matched gap is higher than the raw one, by a median 1.8 points. The raw figure sets a hub carrier’s whole schedule against everyone else’s whole schedule, and the matched figure sets them against each other only where they fly the same route at the same time.

Hub carrier against a rival on the same route and windows

Hub carrier against a rival on the same route and windows
Route leaves or arrives at the hubPairsHub carrier ahead inMedian gap, hub carrier minus rival
Leaves the hub32550.2%+0.1 points
Arrives at the hub31560.6%+1.5 points

Pairs where one airline is the hub carrier at an end of the route and the other is the hub carrier at neither. A group needs at least 30 pairs.

The largest hubs, raw against matched

The largest hubs, raw against matched
AirportHub airlineShare of departuresAgainst all other airlines thereAgainst rivals on the same route and windowHub airline flights compared
ATL AtlantaDelta Air Lines73%+5.2 points+5.5 points52%
DFW Dallas–Fort WorthAmerican Airlines55%-8.7 points-5.2 points37%
LAS Las VegasSouthwest Airlines48%-4.7 points-2.8 points40%
SEA SeattleAlaska Airlines48%-4.8 points-4.5 points65%
EWR NewarkUnited Airlines56%+0.8 points+3.3 points50%
DTW DetroitDelta Air Lines50%+0.5 points+4.0 points38%
MSP MinneapolisDelta Air Lines58%+1.3 points+3.4 points27%
SLC Salt Lake CityDelta Air Lines48%+5.0 points+4.2 points39%
IAH HoustonUnited Airlines63%+0.9 points+5.7 points38%
MIA MiamiAmerican Airlines58%-3.5 points-0.6 points50%
PHL PhiladelphiaAmerican Airlines49%-1.0 points+3.5 points64%
AUS AustinSouthwest Airlines44%-3.2 points-2.6 points33%
SMF SacramentoSouthwest Airlines57%-2.9 points-3.9 points30%
SJC San JoseSouthwest Airlines61%-4.4 points-2.7 points30%
ONT OntarioSouthwest Airlines45%+1.7 points+0.6 points42%

Departures from the airport. The first gap is the hub airline’s on-time rate minus the other compared airlines’ rate over every flight from the airport. The second compares route by route and window by window, weighted by the hub airline’s flights, where both have at least 120. The last column is the share of the hub airline’s departures that had a rival in the same route and window; a hub is shown when it is at least 25%. The 15 largest are shown.

The same ticket on a different aircraft

Some regional carriers fly for exactly one airline, so a passenger who buys that airline’s ticket may end up on either. Envoy Air and PSA Airlines fly only for American Airlines. Where the airline and its regional partner both fly a route in the same windows, Envoy Air arrived on time more often than American Airlines on 93.9% of 115 routes, by a median 8.8 points; PSA Airlines arrived on time more often than American Airlines on 65.1% of 109 routes, by a median 1.9 points. Most of Envoy Air’s routes run through DFW, where the median gap is larger, +11.5 points; away from it Envoy Air was ahead on 87.0% of 54 routes, with a median gap of +5.9 points. Most of PSA Airlines’ routes run through CLT, where the median gap is larger, +2.4 points; away from it PSA Airlines was ahead on 57.1% of 56 routes, with a median gap of +0.7 points. Both are sold under the airline’s name. The comparison holds the route and the time of day fixed and does not hold the aircraft, the terminal or the crew.

A regional carrier against the airline it flies for

A regional carrier against the airline it flies for
Regional carrierFlies forRoutes comparedRegional carrier ahead onMedian gap, regional minus airline
Envoy AirAmerican Airlines11593.9%+8.8 points
PSA AirlinesAmerican Airlines10965.1%+1.9 points

Routes where both have at least 500 flights in the windows they share. A pair of carriers needs at least 30 such routes to be shown.

Where a regional carrier and its airline differ most

Where a regional carrier and its airline differ most
RouteAirlineOn time, airlineRegional carrierOn time, regional carrierGap, regional minus airlineFlights compared, airlineFlights compared, regional carrier
DFW to LBBAmerican Airlines50.9%Envoy Air77.9%+26.9 points1,1622,245
DFW to ECPAmerican Airlines51.9%Envoy Air77.8%+25.9 points9591,103
DFW to CIDAmerican Airlines62.1%Envoy Air84.0%+21.9 points1,8621,238
DFW to ILMAmerican Airlines62.1%Envoy Air82.2%+20.1 points7061,136
DFW to FSDAmerican Airlines61.7%Envoy Air81.0%+19.3 points1,878812
DFW to BHMAmerican Airlines60.2%Envoy Air79.0%+18.8 points7491,653

Routes where the gap is at least 5 standard errors wide and each carrier has at least 500 flights in the shared windows, widest first.

Where the gaps are widest

648 pairs have a gap wide enough to name: at least 5 standard errors, with 500 or more flights per airline in the shared windows. The widest is DEN to PHL, where United Airlines arrived on time 88.3% of the time and Frontier Airlines 57.2% in the same windows. Among the 317 pairs that differ by 10 points or more, Frontier Airlines and Southwest Airlines are the lower airline in 62% and United Airlines and Delta Air Lines the higher in 76%, so the large gaps come mostly from a few airlines meeting each other.

The widest gaps between two airlines on one route

The widest gaps between two airlines on one route
RouteAirline aheadOn time, aheadAirline behindOn time, behindGapFlights compared, aheadFlights compared, behind
DEN to PHLUnited Airlines88.3%Frontier Airlines57.2%31.1 points511757
SJU to ATLDelta Air Lines88.4%Frontier Airlines59.7%28.7 points2,770585
LAX to ATLDelta Air Lines78.9%Frontier Airlines51.5%27.4 points5,656837
HNL to LAXSouthwest Airlines89.8%Alaska Airlines65.4%24.4 points1,428834
LAX to AUSUnited Airlines87.6%Southwest Airlines63.4%24.2 points1,2851,640
SFO to ATLUnited Airlines81.7%Frontier Airlines58.6%23.2 points735851
LGA to ATLDelta Air Lines81.7%Frontier Airlines58.6%23.2 points11,7531,784
BOS to ATLDelta Air Lines87.0%Frontier Airlines64.1%22.9 points7,236691
SFO to PHXUnited Airlines81.5%Frontier Airlines58.8%22.7 points2,058833
SEA to JFKDelta Air Lines84.3%JetBlue62.6%21.7 points1,046674
SFO to ATLDelta Air Lines80.1%Frontier Airlines58.6%21.5 points2,350851
IAH to ATLDelta Air Lines81.6%Frontier Airlines60.1%21.5 points7,3591,647
SAN to SFOUnited Airlines72.4%Frontier Airlines50.9%21.5 points5,403693
SLC to BOSDelta Air Lines88.6%JetBlue67.4%21.2 points936737
PDX to ATLDelta Air Lines90.9%Alaska Airlines70.0%20.9 points1,800517

On-time rates are over the departure windows both airlines fly on the route. The 15 widest of 648 pairs, widest first.

What this does not show

The six windows are wide, so two airlines in the same window can still fly at different hours of it, and the comparison does not hold the day of the week fixed. It cannot see aircraft size, terminal, gate or crew, which differ between airlines and affect on-time arrival. It counts the airline that operated a flight, so a flight sold by one airline and flown by another appears under the operator. Endeavor Air, Hawaiian Airlines and Spirit Airlines did not report every month. SkyWest Airlines and Republic Airways fly for more than one airline, and the data does not say which one sold a given flight. They are not compared. A route with one airline has no comparison, and the routes with two or more are the busier ones. A gap is an average over the whole period and is not a forecast for a particular flight.

Methodology

Calculated by FlyerIntel from 21,708,321 individual flight records in the US Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Reporting Carrier On-Time Performance dataset, covering July 2023 through July 2026. Following BTS methodology, a flight counts as delayed when it arrives 15 or more minutes after its scheduled arrival time. Cancelled and diverted flights have no arrival time and are excluded from on-time rates rather than counted as late; cancellation rates are reported separately. Full definitions are published at /methodology/. This report compares airlines pair by pair on each route. The airlines are American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, Delta Air Lines, Frontier Airlines, Allegiant Air, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines: those that reported every month of the source period, sell their own seats and have at least the site’s airline floor of flights. A route-airline-window cell is one airline’s flights on one route in one of the site’s six departure windows, and a cell with fewer than 120 flights is dropped before anything is summed; 31,207 cells holding 1,143,654 flights were dropped. An airline is on a route with at least 200 flights on it. For two airlines the shared windows are those where both cells survive, and each airline’s on-time rate is averaged over them with weights equal to the two airlines’ completed flights in the window, the same for both. A pair is used when each airline has at least 500 flights in the shared windows; a named pair also needs a gap of at least 5 standard errors. The persistence check assigns each flight to the odd-numbered or even-numbered months of the year and repeats the comparison in each set, with at least 250 flights per airline in the shared windows of each. An airline’s figure against the airlines it meets is the average of its pair gaps weighted by its own shared-window flights, for airlines in at least 30 pairs. A hub carrier is the airline with the largest share of an airport’s departures, at least the share stated above. On-time rates are shares of completed flights, and every difference is taken from unrounded rates.

Limitations

The source dataset covers scheduled domestic flights operated by carriers above the DOT reporting threshold; smaller carriers and international flights are not included. Flights sold under a mainline brand but flown by a regional carrier are attributed to the operating carrier, which is how the DOT records them. Past performance describes what has happened and is not a prediction about any individual flight. The data has no aircraft type, terminal, gate, crew or booking class, and a departure window spans several hours. Flights are attributed to the operating carrier. Carriers that did not report every month and regional carriers that fly for more than one airline are not compared.

Sources

  • FlyerIntel analysis — FlyerIntel · source
  • Reporting Carrier On-Time Performance — US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics · source

Full FlyerIntel methodology · Report a problem with this analysis